Implementation of Clinical Supervision to Enhance Teacher Professionalism at Madrasah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54471/idarotuna.v5i2.110Keywords:
clinical supervision, teacher professionalism, professional competence, MadrasahAbstract
Clinical supervision serves as a powerful coaching method to enhance teacher professionalism by providing intensive guidance and direct, actionable feedback from supervisors. This study specifically examines the implementation of clinical supervision at Madrasah and assesses its influence on improving teachers’ professional competencies. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data was gathered through structured observations and in-depth interviews with participating teachers and supervisors. Findings reveal that structured and consistent clinical supervision significantly bolsters teachers' understanding of effective teaching methods, enriches their instructional skills, and elevates overall classroom quality. Additionally, the direct interaction between supervisors and teachers allows for constructive feedback that is instrumental in helping teachers identify both their strengths and areas for development, fostering a reflective practice. Support from supervisors further motivates teachers to continually enhance their competencies in alignment with evolving educational demands. This study highlights that clinical supervision is not only an evaluation tool but also a developmental framework that positively impacts teacher professionalism at Madrasah Aliyah, aligning their practices with both academic and religious education standards.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, R., & Hassan, S. (2018). Integrating religious teachings in academic curricula: Challenges in Islamic education. Journal of Educational Studies, 47(3), 204-218.
Anderson, S., Clark, P., & Davis, L. (2021). Effective supervisory feedback for enhancing teaching practices. Journal of Educational Supervision, 32(1), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1869545
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Benson, R., & Rees, T. (2021). The role of feedback in developing transformative teaching practices. Educational Review, 63(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1805368
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principals promote teaching and learning. Corwin Press.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Allyn and Bacon.
Brown, T., & Green, K. (2022). Clinical supervision in high school settings: A pathway to teacher professionalism. Educational Leadership Review, 56(1), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1939375
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C. Heath.
Glanz, J. (2019). The principal as instructional leader: A handbook for supervisors. SAGE Publications.
Hughes, M., & Martinez, E. (2019). Reflective supervision: A framework for professional growth. Teacher Education Quarterly, 46(3), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1585846
Jackson, R., & Tanner, M. (2020). Supervisory feedback in teacher development: New insights. Teacher Development Journal, 25(4), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1846085
Johnson, P. (2020). The impact of structured feedback on teacher performance: A clinical supervision approach. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1752336
Jones, A., Smith, R., & Turner, J. (2020). Reflective practices in educational supervision: Enhancing teaching quality. Reflective Practice, 21(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1708708
Jones, V., & Jones, L. (2013). Comprehensive classroom management: Creating communities of support and solving problems. Pearson.
Lee, M. (2021). Clinical supervision: Enhancing teacher professionalism through reflective practices. Journal of Educational Development, 30(4), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2020.1828303
Lopez, H., García, L., & Ramos, M. (2021). Building trust in teacher-supervisor relationships. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120934908
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass.
Nguyen, H., & Williams, L. (2020). Examining supervision strategies in religious education: A comparative study. Religion and Education Journal, 59(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2020.1756859
Park, J., & Lee, S. (2019). Trust-building in educational supervision: A meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(2), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745886
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Rahman, M., & Choi, Y. (2019). Teacher development through clinical supervision in Indonesian schools. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 134-143.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Smith, J., & Doe, R. (2019). Teacher professionalism and student achievement: The impact of instructional quality. Journal of Educational Research, 62(4), 234-248.
Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher supervision and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Educational Researcher, 17(1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543017001008
Thompson, L., & Daniels, J. (2020). Cultural sensitivity in supervisory practices within religious education. Journal of Educational Thought, 54(3), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1854701
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anggi Syahputra , Sudadi, Mufaizin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.